Friday 25 June 2010

This is the Real BBC

The BBC has a long-term strategy.
That strategy has moved, in the past ten years, from surviving and feathering its nest, to promoting the continuing imposition of socialism on the world in general and Britain in particular.

The BBC uses its legacy standing in the world to steal legitimacy from foreign audiences and bolster its reputation at home, while stealing illegitimate propaganda from domestic sources to give the seal of approval to when talking to those foreign audiences.

Meanwhile, in the most unsubtle and embarrassing way, it is milking the presumed British tolerance of the idiosyncrasies of a 'national treasure', ie the BBC, to create the illusion of radical truthfulness when in fact it is preparing the way for the return of the experiment in five years or less.

With breath-taking cynicism, it promotes the Labour view on any issue at every opportunity, and usually in any case, opportune or not; it engages in pantomime-by-facial-expression, whereby its news teams show more expressive mobility to underline their opinions of facts than Marcel Marceau.
These facts are themselves trimmed and carefully selected, in a blatantly off-balance way, always led by BBC value judgments, and always supported by entirely partial alleged expert witnesses who are in fact the exiled cohorts of the previous regime, the regime which they are so careful to drop from any context which is unfavourable.

As far as the BBC is concerned, history started in May 2010, and they don't like it.

Quite whether they will again persuade enough fools to dislike the present and vote for the same old, same old, change, remains to be seen.

I say, scrap the license fee.

Sunday 20 June 2010

Studies In Insolence

By looking 'over the side' occasionally, I can see the context in which I am attempting to operate.

When the movers and shakers of society comprise people with no guiding principle at all, except to hang on, we get the unedifying site of modern social de-evolution.

The governments of the West have no policies, only the wish to remain in their game for the rest of their miserable lives.

And ours.

They cannot formulate an effective response to Islam, which is the same now as it was a hundred and fifty years ago, because the only thing this infestation of politicians is capable of doing is imitating the apparent successes of past actors, invoking these supernatural totems against the fear, but not wishing to face up to identifying the threat that causes it.

This is because to do that, they would inevitable have to identify themselves and their ambitions, which is something they are not mentally equipped to do.

From their first years of 'life', they have inducted themselves into the sheltering influences of whatever they perceive to be dominant, without any thought as to what it is, only that it represents safety from having to stick out their scrawny necks.

So today, when all that comforting fog has evaporated due to the violence of a few desperate, suicidal men, they are utterly unable to act.

Oh yes. They can commit our armies to violence, plus apologies, because violence tends to be absolute.
They make our response conditional on rules, humanitarian aid, ineffectiveness and a total lack of any desire to win a war.

They don't want to call it a war.
Compared to the last ten years, the eighties, that age of excess and explosive liberty, was a prime example of disciplined debate and decision-making, up until the end when in denial of identity, the ruling coalition of soft tories and republicrats ran as fast as they could from identifying the nature of the death of the beast that had been dying so fast up until then.

Because they saw in our freedom, the end of their games.
When they talk of 'society itself being threatened' they mean that there is a cold wind gathering that might blow the dead wood out of their Home Counties gardens and make it necessary for them to come out from behind the Eight Ball.

Well, I've got news for them.

Society is well and truly broken, and the only thing left for them soon will be to shelter behind each other and be the last to be first, like the people with the stones in the Islamic crowds murdering alleged moral law-breakers in the darkening corners of the world.

Which is why they have such sympathy for the murdering bastards.

Friday 11 June 2010

Round Up The Usual Suspects.

The methods that have served weaseling, scum-sucking, socialist insurgents for generations are being applied to such organs as Facebook today.
The rules are as follows:
1)Never lose your temper.
2)Repeat, repeat, repeat.
3)Let no society remain unjoined.
4)Let no opinion go unchallenged; in the event that support is overwhelming, make a token challenge.
5)Use any kind of 'standard' to kill spontaneity.
6)Use any kind of standard to discredit authentic fun and joy.
7)Make belonging to such clubs as Facebook such a bore that any self-respecting Human leaves.
8)By these means use social osmosis to take control of the organisations.
9)Always appear positive and responsible(like Barack).
10)Pretend to lose your temper if it will carry the gullible in a group over to acceptable beliefs.

These are the rules of social insurgence. I just thought you'd like to know what's going on.
And when it's too quiet, don't like that either. The Prime Directive is to ignore things they don't like until they can be acknowledged in a negative way when it is unavoidable.
The curly-brained bastards are always up to something.

Tuesday 8 June 2010

Brownian Motion.

When I was a wee sprogg in school, the teacher decided to demonstrate something called Brownian Motion.
Taking out a cigarette, he blew smoke into a box, then put the box under a microscope.

We all got the chance to see the little smoke particles being bounced around by the air molecules, and even the bad guys were impressed, because, well, it was cigarette smoke.

To the uneducated eye, the reportage of papers such as the Times, Telegraph and Guardian appears to take a consistent position; one of these organs is supposed to be enough to inform and confirm the predispositions of various types in the social firmament.

Look closer.

For every random occurrence of truth, there will be at least five gyrations about the mean of the meaningless 'centre ground'; the publishers are trying to play a numbers game with an entirely imaginary beast, the doyen of the centre, something which only can exist so long as they betray every principle in their attempts to pander to it.

So they try to be 'blue but not too blue', or 'pink but not too pink', and end up being nothing at all.
Their opinion pieces and editorials follow the path of Brownian Motion, bouncing randomly about a fixed point.
Fixed in smoke.

But beware.
The smoke box may be about to fall off the edge of the desk.

Or smoking itself may be banned.